laws of war | Political Minefields

Revised Proposal for an International Convention on Robotic Weapons

• 8 October 2012 • 1 Comment

Posted in Uncategorized
Tags: Autonomous Armed Robots, Autonomous Robots, Autonomy, Convention, Drones, humanitarian law, humanitarianism, international law, Killer Robots, Killer Robots Treaty, laws of war, military robots, Military Technology, Robotic Ethics, Robotic Weapons, Robotics, Treaty, UAV, UAVs, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Proposal for an International Convention on Robotic Weapons

• 2 October 2012 • 2 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized
Tags: #armstreaty, Arms Trade Treaty, Article 36, ATT, Autonomous Armed Robots, battlespace, blinding lasers, CETMONS, civilian casualties, civilian impact, Cluster Munition Convention, cluster munitions, Columbia, Consortium on Emerging Technologies Military Operations and National Security, drone strikes, drone wars, Drones, explosive violence, Global Policy, humanitarian law, humanitarianism, ICRAC, International Committee for Robot Arms Control, landmines, laws of war, less-lethal weapons, Military Robotics, military robots, military transformation, mines, non-lethal weapons, Nuclear Weapons, NYU, Ottawa Convention, Pakistan, Peter Bergen, Predator, Reaper, Richard Moyes, Robotic Weapons, Stanford, survivor assistance, Thomas Nash, UAV, UAVs, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Victim Assistance, WMD

Why I Have Joined the International Committee on Robot Arms Control

• 7 May 2012 • 5 Comments

Posted in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Iraq, Sudan
Tags: Article 36, Autonomous Armed Robots, Bosnia, Brcko, Brcko District, Digital Warfare, humanitarian law, humanitarianism, ICRAC, ICRC, International Campaign to Ban Landmines, International Committee for Robot Arms Control, International Committee of the Red Cross, landmines, laws of war, Military Robotics, military robots, Mine Ban Treaty, mines, Ottawa Convention, technophilia